THE EFFECT OF MOLAR UPRIGHTING SPRING LENGTH ON FORCE SYSTEMS GENERATED BY NICKEL-TITANIUM SPRINGS

Authors

  • Henrique Barcelos Brandão Author
  • Lucas Arrais de Campos Author
  • Alyssa Schiavon Gandini Author
  • Carolina Servidoni Spreafico Author
  • Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/ERR01v11n1-010

Keywords:

Orthodontic, Biomechanics, Materials, Forces, Tipping

Abstract

This study evaluated the force system generated by the Memory Titanol Spring (MTS) with different nickel-titanium segment lengths for molar uprighting using an orthodontic force tester (OFT). The springs were activated at 30° in the posterior segment (β) and divided into four groups (G0, G1, G2, G3). The nickel-titanium and steel connection were fixed at 0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm from the molar auxiliary tube curvature. Each group had five MTS, with steel measuring 0.017" by 0.022" and nickel-titanium 0.018" by 0.025". Molars showed extrusion in all groups, with mean values of -0.54 N (G0), -0.68 N (G1), -0.66 N (G2), and -0.66 N (G3). The anterior reacting unit showed mandibular premolar intrusion from 0.56 N (G0, G2) to 0.67 N (G3). Uprighting moments (Ty) of the molars indicated distal moments of 17.62 N·mm (G0), 16.47 N·mm (G1), 16.58 N·mm (G2), and 14.76 N·mm (G3). Distal premolar moments were 1.49 N·mm (G0), 2.63 N·mm (G1), 2.44 N·mm (G2), and 2.42 N·mm (G3). Nickel-titanium segment length showed statistical differences. All pre-activations generated molar extrusion and premolar intrusion at low intensity. G0 was most favorable for molar uprighting. All groups showed low-intensity distal moments on the anterior anchorage side, likely sub-optimal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Normando, A. D., Maia, F. A., Ursi, W. J., & Simone, J. L. (2010). Dentoalveolar changes after unilateral extractions of mandibular first molars and their influence on third molar development and position. World Journal of Orthodontics, 11(1), 55–60.

2. Burstone, C. J. (1962). Rationale of the segmented arch. American Journal of Orthodontics, 48(11), 805–822.

3. Gravina, M. A., Brunharo, I. H., Canavarro, C., Elias, C. N., & Quintão, C. C. (2013). Mechanical properties of NiTi and CuNiTi shape-memory wires used in orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Stress-strain tests. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 18(4), 35–42.

4. Wichelhaus, A., & Sander, F. G. (1995). Entwicklung und Testung einer neuen NiTi-SE-Stahl-Aufrichtefeder [The development and testing of a new NiTi-SE-steel uprighting spring]. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 56(6), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173155

5. Sander, F. G., & Wichelhaus, A. (1995). [The clinical use of the new NiTi-SE-steel uprighting spring]. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 56(6), 296–308. (Original work published in German)

6. Burstone, C. J., & Koenig, H. A. (1988). Creative wire bending—the force system from step and V bends. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93(1), 59–67.

7. Alcântara, R. M. (2006). Estudo da distribuição das tensões provenientes de molas helicoidais utilizadas na verticalização de molares pelo método da fotoelasticidade de transmissão plana [Tese de doutorado não publicada]. Universidade Estadual Paulista.

8. Chen, J. (2000). Apparatus and method for measuring orthodontic force applied by an orthodontic appliance (U.S. Patent No. 6,120,287). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

9. Ribeiro, A. A. (2015). Avaliação mecânica tridimensional de molas T compostas de NiTi e aço [Tese de doutorado não publicada]. Universidade Estadual Paulista.

10. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30

11. Fermanian, J. (1984). Mesure de l’accord entre deux juges. Cas qualitatif. Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, 32(2), 140–147.

12. Burstone, C. J. (1994). Application of bioengineering to clinical orthodontics. In T. M. Graber & R. L. Vanarsdall (Eds.), Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques (2nd ed., pp. 235–267). Mosby.

13. Burstone, C. J., & Koenig, H. A. (1981). Precision adjustment of the transpalatal lingual arch: Computer arch form predetermination. American Journal of Orthodontics, 79(2), 115–133.

14. Pinheiro, C. L. (2019). Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões cisalhantes em segundos molares inferiores inclinados [Dissertação de mestrado não publicada]. Universidade Estadual Paulista.

15. Koenig, H. A., & Burstone, C. J. (1989). Force systems from an ideal arch—large deflection considerations. The Angle Orthodontist, 59(1), 11–16.

16. Bogdanov, V. (2022). Evaluation of the maximum bite force in individuals with different vertical facial types. MedInform, 2, 1498–1502. https://doi.org/10.18044/MEDINFORM.202292.1498

17. Nascimento, G. K., Lima, L. M., Rodrigues, C. B., Cunha, R. A., Cunha, D. A., & Silva, H. J. (2011). Verificação da força de mordida e da atividade elétrica dos músculos masseteres durante a mastigação em laringectomizados totais. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia, 68(2), 175–179.

18. Shiabasaki, W. M. M., & Martins, R. P. (2021). Loads of continuous mechanics for uprighting the second molar on the second molar and premolar. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 160(4), 627–635.

19. Brandão, H. B., Bianchi, J., Campos, L. A., Gandini, A. S., & Gandini Junior, L. G. (2024). Evaluation of force systems generated by memory Titalon® springs with different preactivation bends. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 29(5), Article e23430. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e23430.oar

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE EFFECT OF MOLAR UPRIGHTING SPRING LENGTH ON FORCE SYSTEMS GENERATED BY NICKEL-TITANIUM SPRINGS. (2026). ERR01, 11(1), e11764. https://doi.org/10.56238/ERR01v11n1-010